Scalable Infrastructure for Low-Latency Trading

Q: What are the key benefits of using a hybrid approach with edge computing and centralized systems in low-latency trading?

A hybrid approach that blends edge computing with centralized systems brings a host of benefits to low-latency trading platforms: Faster response times : Processing data locally at the edge allows critical decisions to happen almost instantly, cutting down delays caused by sending data back and forth to a central server. Immediate market reactions : Traders can act on market shifts in real time, which is crucial in fast-paced trading environments. Efficient bandwidth use : By transmitting only the most important data to central systems, this approach eases network traffic and boosts overall system performance. This combination equips trading platforms to manage high-frequency operations with greater speed and dependability, making it a solid choice for today’s financial markets.

In high-frequency trading, speed and scalability are everything. Milliseconds - or even microseconds - can determine profits or losses. To stay competitive, trading platforms must process massive data volumes while maintaining ultra-low latency. Two main approaches dominate this space:

Edge Computing: Processes data close to its source, cutting latency by up to 90% and enabling trades in microseconds.
Centralized Systems: Leverages powerful data centers for complex computations but struggles with higher latency and bottlenecks during market surges.

Key Takeaways:

Edge Computing: Reduces latency to 8–12 milliseconds, scales efficiently, and integrates well with real-time APIs. However, it has limited computing power and storage at local nodes.
Centralized Systems: Handles large datasets and ensures consistent security but faces latency issues and single points of failure.

A hybrid model combining both systems is emerging as the best solution. Edge computing powers real-time tasks like trade execution, while centralized systems support broader analytics and compliance. This approach ensures speed, scalability, and reliability in a fast-evolving market.

Managing an Ultra Low Latency Trading Infrastructure - Build vs Buy: TNS, Celent & Equinix Webinar

1. Edge Computing Infrastructure

Edge computing is reshaping trading systems by bringing computational power closer to market data sources, enabling ultra-low-latency trading.

Latency

Edge computing has slashed transaction processing times in trading systems by an average of 69%, while reducing data processing latency for financial applications by 91%. Traditional cloud systems often operate with latencies between 100–150 milliseconds, but edge solutions cut this down to just 8–12 milliseconds. Firms like Jump Trading and Citadel Securities are already leveraging edge computing by placing servers near stock exchanges to execute trades with minimal delay. These latency reductions are essential for managing the immense workloads of modern trading.

Scalability

Scalability is another area where edge computing shines, enabling firms to handle large volumes of trading activity without sacrificing speed. By processing data directly at the source - often within co-location facilities near exchanges - companies can expand operations while maintaining the microsecond-level performance critical for competitive trading.

One financial institution revamped its trading systems with edge computing, achieving microsecond-level latency reductions. This upgrade allowed its algorithms to exploit arbitrage opportunities that slower systems would miss, showcasing how hardware advancements are vital for high-frequency trading success.

"The fusion of industrial computing and financial technology is not just likely, it's unavoidable. As competition heats up, specialized hardware will be key to securing a foothold." – Karl Mozurkewich, Senior AI Architect at Valdi

These performance and scalability improvements are further amplified when combined with real-time API data integration.

Integration with Real-Time APIs

Edge computing is particularly effective at integrating real-time APIs for market data, such as commodity price feeds. By processing data closer to its origin, edge computing minimizes latency and reduces the strain caused by bandwidth limitations. For example, platforms using OilpriceAPI can process commodity data faster, enabling quicker decisions in energy trading.

Additionally, edge computing supports serverless API architectures, offering automatic resource allocation that lowers costs and enhances compliance with regional regulations. By 2025, it’s predicted that 75% of enterprise-generated data will come from outside centralized data centers, yet only 27% of organizations have adopted edge computing, with 54% still evaluating its potential. The importance of speed is underscored by Amazon’s finding that a 100-ms delay in website load time can reduce conversion rates by 1%, a statistic that emphasizes the value of microsecond-level gains in trading.

Security and Compliance

Security is a crucial consideration for the decentralized nature of edge computing. To ensure data integrity, firms must adopt robust security measures, such as zero-trust models and encryption, across multiple locations. Building resilience into systems is also critical - features like graceful degradation, offline modes, and asynchronous patterns allow operations to continue even during network disruptions or node failures.

When integrating real-time APIs for market data, security becomes even more important. Edge-optimized APIs need to prioritize speed while adhering to strict financial industry standards. This includes incorporating location awareness, efficient payloads, and effective data compression to maintain both performance and security.

2. Centralized Systems

Centralized systems rely on remote data centers for processing and managing data. While effective in some scenarios, they face notable challenges when compared to modern edge computing, especially in low-latency trading environments.

Latency

One major drawback of centralized systems is their struggle with latency. The need to transmit data over long distances introduces delays that can significantly impact performance. On the New York Stock Exchange, where programmed trading accounts for 70% of daily volume, minimizing latency is critical. Modern trading platforms now achieve latencies under 50 milliseconds, while centralized systems often fall short, especially when ultra-low latency - measured in nanoseconds - is required. To address these delays, many financial firms have relocated their operations closer to trading exchanges, but even this strategy has its limits. These latency challenges also restrict centralized systems' ability to scale efficiently during periods of heightened market activity.

Scalability

Scalability is another key issue for centralized systems. As trading volumes grow, scaling typically involves upgrading central resources. However, this approach creates bottlenecks and a single point of failure, particularly during volatile market conditions. When trading activity spikes, centralized systems can become overwhelmed, leading to slower execution times and diminished performance.

The table below highlights the differences between centralized and decentralized scaling approaches:

Aspect	Centralized Scaling	Decentralized Scaling
Method	Upgrade central entity	Add nodes, improve node efficiency, optimize coordination
Single Point of Failure	High	Low
Coordination	Simple (internal)	Complex (network consensus)
Typical Latency	Lower	Higher (due to propagation and consensus)
Throughput Limit	Bounded by central resources	Limited by coordination overhead and network latency

While horizontal scaling (adding more machines) and vertical scaling (enhancing a single machine's power) can improve performance, centralized systems eventually hit physical and architectural limits.

Integration with Real-Time APIs

Centralized systems excel in integrating with real-time APIs, which can provide valuable market data for informed decision-making. For instance, by connecting with services like OilpriceAPI, centralized systems can access and analyze commodity price data at scale, enabling organizations to respond quickly to market trends.

A practical example comes from MIAC Analytics, which leveraged CME Group's WebSocket API to boost TBA price execution. Danielle Roper, Senior TBA Trader at MIAC Analytics, noted that the integration with the CME Group TBA Futures via WebSocket improved execution by nearly 2/32nd. However, centralized systems face bottlenecks during market surges since all API data is processed through a single server before distribution. Despite these limitations, CME Group’s Real-Time Futures and Options Data API offers competitive pricing and remains a valuable tool for many trading operations.

Security and Compliance

Security is a double-edged sword for centralized systems. Their consolidated architecture simplifies the implementation of consistent security measures and monitoring. However, this same centralization creates vulnerabilities - if the central hub is compromised, the entire system is at risk. The concentration of sensitive trading data and algorithms in one location makes these systems attractive targets for cyberattacks, including those from state-sponsored actors.

From a compliance standpoint, centralized systems are well-suited for maintaining consistent records and enforcing uniform policies. But they often struggle to meet the stringent latency and availability standards required in high-frequency trading, where even a millisecond can make a difference. Balancing these regulatory demands with performance and security remains a significant challenge.

sbb-itb-a92d0a3

Advantages and Disadvantages

When deciding between edge computing and centralized systems for low-latency trading, financial institutions face a balancing act. Each approach comes with its own set of trade-offs that affect performance, security, and operational efficiency. Let’s break down the strengths and limitations of both systems to help trading platforms make informed decisions.

Edge computing shines in scenarios where speed is critical. Institutions using edge infrastructure have reported up to 69% faster transaction processing and 91% lower data latency compared to traditional setups. This approach also boosts scalability, with some firms noting a 78% improvement in scalability metrics. During high-demand periods, like tax season, edge-enabled systems maintained 99.99% uptime, even with a 340% increase in mobile check deposit volume.

However, edge computing isn’t without its challenges. The local nodes often have limited computing power, storage, and network bandwidth. These constraints can limit the complexity of algorithms and the depth of data analysis that can be performed directly at the edge, requiring careful optimization of trading strategies.

Centralized systems, on the other hand, excel in areas where edge computing struggles. They offer vast resources for handling complex computations and storing large datasets. Their centralized nature simplifies security management, with tools and protocols designed for monitoring and enforcement. This setup also makes it easier to maintain consistent records and enforce uniform policies, which is crucial for regulatory compliance.

Centralized systems are particularly strong when it comes to robust API connectivity, enabling comprehensive market data analysis across multiple asset classes and trading instruments.

But centralized systems have their own drawbacks, especially in high-frequency trading environments. They are prone to bottlenecks during periods of market volatility when trading activity surges. Additionally, their centralized architecture creates a larger attack surface, making them more attractive targets for cyberattacks.

Here’s a side-by-side comparison of the two approaches:

Aspect	Edge Computing	Centralized Systems
Latency Performance	Up to 90% reduction vs. cloud systems	Higher latency due to distance
Processing Speed	50% faster trade processing	Slower execution times
Scalability	78% improvement in scalability metrics	Bottlenecks during peak activity
Resource Availability	Limited computing and storage capacity	Abundant resources for complex operations
Security Approach	Reduced attack surface with local processing	Greater attack surface with centralized protection
Reliability	Varies by local device performance	High reliability backed by SLAs
Data Transmission Costs	43% reduction in data transmission costs	Higher transmission costs
Infrastructure Flexibility	Rapid resource adjustment	Significant lead time for expansion

Given these contrasting strengths and weaknesses, many firms are now adopting hybrid architectures. This approach combines the real-time processing power of edge computing for latency-sensitive operations with the comprehensive data analysis and regulatory support of centralized systems.

As Flavio Bonomi, a board technology advisor at Lynx Software Technologies, explains:

"Storing data locally is more private. People and organizations don't trust that big cloud companies will use their data in a well-meaning way. Storing data on the edge will support a safer environment."

This hybrid strategy also enhances risk management. For example, edge-based anomaly detection systems can identify irregularities in financial transactions with up to 99% greater accuracy. At the same time, centralized systems provide the robust infrastructure and security needed to handle broader operational demands. Together, these systems create a balanced solution for modern financial institutions.

Conclusion

Edge computing and centralized systems each bring unique strengths to the world of low-latency trading.

Edge computing operates by processing data directly at its source, cutting latency to under 5 milliseconds - far faster than the 20–40 milliseconds typical in centralized systems. As Jonny Cameron from Simply NUC puts it:

"In high-frequency trading, a tiny delay can cost you. A trade that arrives a millisecond late might as well not have arrived at all."

On the other hand, centralized systems excel in delivering powerful data analysis, ensuring compliance, and handling the heavy computational requirements vital for U.S. trading platforms.

A hybrid approach combining these two models appears to be the way forward. Gartner projects that by 2025, 75% of data will be processed outside traditional data centers. Meanwhile, the U.S. edge computing market is set to hit $43.59 billion by 2029, growing at a 12.5% annual rate. By using edge computing for ultra-low latency tasks like order execution and real-time market data processing, and relying on centralized systems for regulatory reporting, risk management, and deeper analytics, trading platforms can achieve both peak performance and regulatory compliance.

This dual strategy is especially important in commodity markets, where up-to-the-second pricing is non-negotiable. For instance, platforms can strengthen their infrastructure by using data services like OilpriceAPI's JSON REST API, which provides real-time pricing for Brent Crude, WTI, Natural Gas, and Gold.

The future belongs to trading platforms that can seamlessly merge the speed of edge computing with the scalability and security of centralized systems, ensuring a lasting competitive advantage in an ever-evolving market.

FAQs

What are the key benefits of using a hybrid approach with edge computing and centralized systems in low-latency trading?

A hybrid approach that blends edge computing with centralized systems brings a host of benefits to low-latency trading platforms:

Faster response times: Processing data locally at the edge allows critical decisions to happen almost instantly, cutting down delays caused by sending data back and forth to a central server.
Immediate market reactions: Traders can act on market shifts in real time, which is crucial in fast-paced trading environments.
Efficient bandwidth use: By transmitting only the most important data to central systems, this approach eases network traffic and boosts overall system performance.

This combination equips trading platforms to manage high-frequency operations with greater speed and dependability, making it a solid choice for today’s financial markets.

How does edge computing help lower latency in high-frequency trading?

Edge computing plays a crucial role in high-frequency trading by cutting down latency through processing data closer to its origin - often within or near exchange data centers. This closer proximity slashes the time it takes for data to travel, allowing for quicker decision-making and faster execution of trades.

By performing essential computations locally, edge computing ensures trading platforms can react instantly to market fluctuations. In an environment where even milliseconds can make or break profitability, this speed offers a significant edge.

What are the key security practices for integrating edge computing with real-time financial data APIs?

To securely integrate edge computing with real-time financial data APIs, start by using strong encryption methods to safeguard data both in transit and at rest. Pair this with multi-factor authentication to ensure only authorized users or systems can access sensitive APIs and resources.

It's also wise to implement network segmentation to keep sensitive information and critical systems isolated, minimizing the risk of unauthorized access. Regularly updating firmware is another key step to closing security gaps, while physical security measures can help protect edge devices from tampering or theft. Finally, a layered security strategy that includes continuous monitoring and threat detection will help you stay ahead of emerging cybersecurity challenges.